Posts Tagged ‘T-mobile’

10 Ways Apple Could Use the iPhone as a Weapon

Thursday, March 25th, 2010

News Analysis: As Apple’s iPhone sales continue to soar, some are wondering what Apple could do with its installed base. Trying to answer that, we take a look at 10 ways Apple could use the iPhone as a weapon against carriers, developers, competitors and others.

With news breaking that Apple is selling the iPhone at full price without requiring customers to buy a contract, some are wondering what CEO Steve Jobs has up his sleeve. Is this a thinly veiled attempt to help users unlock their iPhones and bring them to T-Mobile?

Is it a shot over AT&T’s bow, saying Apple is done playing nice? Or is it a response to Google’s decision to offer Nexus One smartphones online, rather than in carrier stores? While all of those scenarios are possible, it’s most likely that Apple is simply trying to get rid of some of its iPhone supply before it prepares for a new version of the device later in the year.

In any case, the speculation over this move is running rampant. But perhaps it underscores something that too many people have overlooked: Apple can use the iPhone as a weapon.

Whether AT&T, Google and customers like it or not, the iPhone is an extremely important device in today’s mobile market. The product has single-handedly revitalized AT&T’s business, changed the mobile market and ensured that consumer desire will always in some way be determined by the products Apple puts out. That kind of power can have far-reaching effects. And it means that Apple could capitalize on its standing in the marketplace and use the iPhone to impose its will.

Let’s take a look at how Apple could the iPhone as a weapon against any and all stakeholders.

  1. Pressure AT&T

    Apple holds the most power over AT&T. Unlike so many other carriers in the mobile market, AT&T is heavily invested in the iPhone. In fact, it’s one of the key reasons why the company has been so successful attracting and maintaining customers. Apple is well aware of that. If and when the company wants to finally break free from AT&T, Apple can use the iPhone to work out just about any deal it wants. Or it might even work out a sweetheart deal that would keep the iPhone exclusive to AT&T. And unfortunately for AT&T, there’s nothing it can do about it. Without the iPhone, it would be in trouble.

  2. Take on developers

    Apple’s contentious relationship with developers could get worse if the company decides to use the iPhone as a weapon against them. The problem for developers is that Apple’s installed base is huge compared with those of the makers of other touch-screen devices. So, even though developers might not like the fact that Apple’s App Store policies are secretive and sometimes draconian, they don’t want to push the company too far for fear of losing that key revenue stream. At the same time, Apple knows that if it really wants to control developers, it can use that fear to do so. Developers are in a bad spot.

  3. App Store mania

    Even though Apple has gone out of its way to limit content that it doesn’t want in the App Store, there’s more that can be done. If Apple really wants to, it can create specific rules for what can be allowed in its store and what cannot. Worried that they would lose App Store revenue, buttonholed developers would have no choice but to listen. Consumers would also need to live with those rules if they wanted to keep using the iPhone. The App Store is an extension of the iPhone’s power. Apple would have little trouble using it to dominate.

  4. Take on other carriers

    Although Apple’s power is most forceful against AT&T, the company can still use the iPhone to take on other carriers. Thanks to the iPhone’s success, Apple can go to Verizon Wireless or T-Mobile to see what kind of deal either company would offer. If it finds something a little better than what it has at AT&T, we could see a drastic shift in the way Apple does business in the mobile market. Apple could opt to go multicarrier and give preferential treatment to, say, Verizon Wireless, and totally change how the iPhone is perceived in the market. And there would be nothing AT&T, T-Mobile or Sprint could do about it.

  5. Consumer desire?

    Although consumers have been calling on Apple to add new features to the iPhone, including multitasking, Jobs has done little to swiftly bring desired features to the device. Instead, he has waited until he’s good and ready to update the iPhone. That’s a problem. Thanks to the iPhone’s success, Apple has little reason to worry about complaints from consumers. Sure, it wants to satisfy consumer desire, but the company clearly feels that it can do that whenever it wants. After all, Apple controls the iPhone and decides what’s in it. What can consumers really do about it? The longer it has that control, the less Apple might listen.

  6. Use patents on vendors

    If Apple is successful in its patent-infringement case against HTC, the entire mobile market could change. Apple’s lawsuit includes several charges, such as alleged infringement of both the iPhone’s screen-unlock functionality and the way users move around a Web page in a mobile browser. With a victory, Apple could bring a lawsuit to every other vendor in the market that it believes is violating its patent. That could help the company dominate the market even more. Watch out for that patent lawsuit. If Apple wins, it could be lights out for some of its competitors.

  7. Eliminate conventional sales

    Apple has the power to drastically change the way vendors offer their phones. Currently, Google sells the Nexus One smartphone from its own Website. Carriers are concerned that Google’s retail model could prompt other vendors to follow suit. Well, what if Apple does? Such a move could send shockwaves through the industry and cause carriers to start worrying about bottom lines that rely heavily on in-store sales. If Apple and Google, arguably the market’s most influential companies, set a new retail standard in the market, carriers will need to start worrying.

  8. Use it to the iPad’s advantage

    The iPhone can be used to the iPad’s advantage if Apple plays its cards right. The tablet industry could be a significantly profitable space for Apple. But that will only be true if the iPad enjoys the kind of success Apple has witnessed with its iPhone and iPod. The beauty of the iPad is that it runs Apple’s iPhone OS. With just a few changes here and there, Apple can improve the tablet’s operating system and surpass the competition. And since that OS is desired above all others, it should only help Apple sell iPads. The iPhone OS is just as much a weapon as the iPhone itself.

  9. Mac OS X’s Trojan horse?

    Even though Apple has substantially lower operating system market share than Windows in the desktop market, the iPhone could help Apple attract more PC users to its side. In the tech industry, the halo effect is extremely important. Essentially, as users try products from a company and like what they see, they are more likely to buy other products from that company. Apple’s iPhone is extremely successful. In some cases, it has brought new customers to Apple’s side. If the company can find a way to capitalize on those converts and deliver them to Mac OS X, Microsoft could feel the effect. We simply can’t underestimate the iPhone’s importance to Mac OS X.

  10. Pressure the entertainment industry

    The iPhone is also an iPod. Realizing that, it’s important to remember that the more iPhones Apple sells, the more power it wields against the music and movie industries. Time and again, the entertainment business has railed against Apple’s power and attempted to limit it as much as possible. But each time, it has failed. As Apple sells more iPhones, it can bring that burgeoning installed base (plus all the iTunes purchases iPhone owners make) and use it as leverage in its negotiations with record labels and film studios. And those companies will have little choice but to give in to some of Apple’s demands.

Simply put, the more iPhones Apple sells, the more troublesome it is to, well, just about everyone it’s up against.

Resource:

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/IT-Management/10-Ways-Apple-Could-Use-the-iPhone-As-a-Weapon-790036/

Google Nexus One Now Runs on ATandT 3G in U.S., Rogers in Canada

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

Google said the Nexus One is now available from Google’s Webstore as an unlocked device without a service plan for AT&T’s 3G network in the U.S. and on Rogers Wireless in Canada. Nexus One devices can also now be shipped to Canada from Google’s Webstore and will work with a SIM from Rogers Wireless. If the Nexus One can find purchase on AT&T’s network, it may be able to more directly challenge Apple’s iPhone, currently carried exclusively by AT&T.

Google March 16 said it now selling a version of its Nexus One smartphone that runs on AT&T’s 3G network and Rogers Wireless, a move that could broaden the device’s appeal and put it more squarely in competition with Apple’s world-beating iPhone 3GS.

The Nexus One is now available from Google’s Webstore as an unlocked device without a service plan for AT&T’s 3G network in the U.S. and on Rogers Wireless in Canada. Nexus One devices can also now be shipped to Canada from Google’s Webstore and will work with a SIM from Rogers Wireless, the company said.

Google’s Nexus One is based on the search engine’s Android operating system, an open source platform around which more than 20 different handsets have been built. The device, which runs the latest Android 2.1, includes a speedy 1 GHz processor.

When Google launched the Nexus One from its Webstore Jan. 5, the company made device available unlocked for $529 and with a two-year contract from T-Mobile for $179.

Google officials also pledged to make the Nexus One available on Verizon Wireless and via Vodafone in the spring. Recent reports indicated Verizon could sell the Nexus One as early as March 23, with the device rolling out from Vodafone in April.

In February, mobile gadget blogs discovered that the Federal Communications Commission had blessed a version of the Nexus One smartphone that runs on AT&T’s 3G network.

Google designed the Nexus One to be unlocked, which means users can use it with a SIM card from most GSM operators worldwide.

While the device is compatible with 3G networks such as T-Mobile, carriers such as AT&T and Rogers have different 3G frequencies. Accordingly, users owning SIM cards from AT&T or Rogers devices could only access 2G or EDGE networks on their Nexus One.

That all changed today. Users may choose from two versions of the Nexus One: one with 3G coverage on networks that use the 850 MHz, 1900 MHz, and 2100 MHz frequency bands. This is recommended for use on AT&T in the US and Rogers in Canada.

Google also offers the Nexus One with 3G coverage on networks that use the 900 MHz, AWS, and 2100 MHz frequency bands. This is recommended for use on T-Mobile in the U.S..

This move is a bit of positive news in the wake of a dismal new report from analytics researcher Flurry, which found that the Nexus One sold only 135,000 units through its first 74 days of retail sale.

By contrast, the Android-based Motorola Droid from Verizon Wireless sold 1.05 million units, while Apple’s inaugural iPhone shipped 1 million copies in 2007.

If the Nexus One can find purchase on AT&T’s network, it may be able to more directly challenge Apple’s iPhone, currently carried exclusively by AT&T.

With features such as pinch-to-zoom multitouch, the Nexus One has been compared to the iPhone with all of its functionality. This is big reason why Apple has sued Nexus One manufacturer HTC Corp. for infringing on some 20 of its smartphone patents dating back the last several years.

The idea is to take Android down a few notches as Apple seeks to defend its turf from Google-based phones.

Resource:

http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Mobile-and-Wireless/Google-Nexus-One-Now-Runs-on-ATT-3G-in-US-Rogers-in-Canada-320991/

Orange and T-Mobile Merge Soon to be approved

Friday, February 26th, 2010

News from http://www.mobilemarketingnews.co.uk

This week it is expected that the merger between Orange and T-Mobile, forming the biggest mobile phone operator in the UK, will receive regulatory approval.

The European Commission has decided not to pass the enquiry back to the UK regulator, despite fears from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) that the merger will “significantly” reduce competition.

What convinced the commission to allow the merger to go ahead were assurances from Orange and T-Mobile to protect the future of 3, the UK’s smallest mobile phone network. The two companies agreed, last night, that they would extend a network-sharing deal with 3 to 16,000 mast sites across the UK.

In fact, it was concerns about the future of 3 that prompted the OFT to ask for control of the investigation earlier this month. The OFT was worried that reducing competition from five players to three in the UK mobile arena would irrevocably change the mobile landscape.

There will also be an agreement stated between Orange and T-Mobile that they will let go of 25 per cent of their combined 1800 MHz spectrum, the wavelength required for super-fast mobile broadband internet.

It is not known whether competitors Vodafone and O2 will challenge the merger, but it is understood that they have pushed for more of the valuable spectrum, granted in the 1990s, to be relinquished by the merger companies.

Amidst concerns that the merger could increase the cost of mobile phone contracts, consumer groups such as Which? had been in favour of a UK investigation.

At the same time, France Telecom, which owns Orange, and Deutsche Telecom for T-Mobile had been pushing for a Euroapean investigation rather than a UK one which they thought would be slower to reach a decision.

Resource :

http://www.mobilemarketingnews.co.uk/Orange_and_T-mobile_Merge_Soon_to_be_Approved_9222215148343.html