Archive for the ‘ASP and ASP.NET Development’ Category

Survey Most iPad owners have Macs, iPhones

Tuesday, April 6th, 2010

iPad owners are huge Apple fans who already own Macs, an iPhone, and at least one iPod, according to a weekend survey from Piper Jaffray.

Piper Jaffray senior analyst Gene Munster, who coordinated a survey of 448 iPad buyers on Saturday, said 74 percent of iPad owners surveyed currently own a Mac, while just 26 percent own a PC.

Apple has also done a good job attracting iPhone owners, Munster found. About 66 percent of those surveyed said that they currently own an iPhone. A whopping 99 percent of those iPhone owners say they will use their handset in conjunction with the iPad.

Not surprisingly, 92 percent of iPad owners currently own an iPod. And out of that group, 97 percent said they will use both products going forward.

The survey also shed light on the preferences of iPad buyers: 39 percent were buying a 16GB iPad model, 32 percent a 32GB model, and 28 percent a 64GB model.

It also found that 74 percent plan to surf the Web on the iPad, 38 percent plan to read books, 34 percent expect to check e-mail, and 26 percent plan to watch video.

Another interesting fact: a whopping 78 percent of respondents said that they didn’t even consider buying an iPad alternative prior to picking up Apple’s tablet on Saturday.

By the way, Munster may know a lot of iPad buyers but he may need to re-evaluate his powers of prediction. Over the weekend, he upped his estimate of first-day iPad sales from 200,000-300,000 to 600,00-700,000. But on Monday, Apple released its first-day sales figures: 300,000.

Resource:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-10472604-17.html

T-Mobile, Vodafone, Orange and Virgin HTC Desire deals compared

Saturday, April 3rd, 2010

The HTC Desire was only announced two months ago, yet it’s not only in consumers’ hands, it’s also causing a lot of excitement.

We might have given it our first five star review in donkey’s years, but that’s not the end of the story – the public wants to know how to get it on the cheap as well.

And they’re being spoilt with the HTC Desire, as it’s coming to all six top providers – but that means a plethora of deals to sort through.

But don’t worry, as we’ve trawled the official provider’s tariffs and cracked out the calculators to work out the cash behind the contracts – how much will each really cost you?

We’re not talking about how little it will cost you at the start – there are plenty of ways to get a free phone and a bagillion minutes, but we want to know how much lighter your wallet will be in 18 to 24 months.

Note: We’ve not yet received official word on tariffs from O2, 3 or Orange (although we’ve taken those offered by The Carphone Warehouse for the latter), but we’ll update the article as they emerge.

We’ve taken a few things into account – the amount of cash you’ll chuck into the pockets of each network over the course of the deal, the minutes on offer, the contract length and handset cost, to find the cheapest overall cost for each network.

All are offering unlimited texts with the deals (although for T-Mobile this is a free Booster option; you could switch this for cheaper international calls for instance).

Also all of the deals we surveyed offer unlimited internet (with the exception of Vodafone, that’s only giving away a measly 500MB per month) because let’s be honest – if you’re not going to use the HTC Desire for a lot of data hungry applications and internet, then there’s not really a lot of point picking it up.

So once you’ve decided how long you can want to keep the phone for, and how many minutes you’re likely to be chatting for each month, have a look at TechRadar’s friendly chart to see which is the best deal for you:

If the thought of having to roll over and stare at the same (phone) face every day for two years is too much for you, then perhaps you’d be better off not tying yourself into a deal for 24 months.

18-month deals will generally cost the same as their two year brethren, but you do generally get more minutes and the chance to pick up a nice and shiny new phone sooner.

100-200 mins

There aren’t a lot of deals around for this price point, with only Virgin Media and T-Mobile chiming in with offers.

T-Mobile just shades it though: for £15 per month and £164 for the Desire, you get 100 minutes and an overall cost of £434.

Virgin Media’s offer might give you 200 minutes, but an extra tenner per month hurts over the year and half, despite the handset costing less up front.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £434

300 mins

T-Mobile is all on its lonesome in this category, with nobody else coming with a similar deal at the moment.

However, the deal isn’t too bad: £20 a month for 300 minutes, although £129 is a lot to pay at the start for the phone.

Don’t fret though – over the course of the deal it boils down to £489, which is a lot cheaper than buying a phone and whacking a pay-as-you go SIM in.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £434

600 mins

We’ve got three players in the space this time: T-Mobile, Vodafone and Virgin Media. If you’re against the pink network, look away now: T-Mobile is cheapest again.

With a £25 per month deal and a £129 upfront cost, the overall deal works out at £579 over the 18 months.

Vodafone is next up, with a £35 per month deal that costs £630 overall, with a free phone. However, you do get 300 extra minutes for signing up online, although there’s that pesky 500MB data limit.

And Virgin Media lags in last, with a £30 per month deal with a £115 upfront cost, taking the overall total to £655.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £579

800 – 900 mins

The same three again – T-Mobile, Vodafone and Virgin Media duke it out.

And this time we have a new winner – Virgin Media shaves it with a £35 per month deal offering 800 minutes and a free phone that costs £360 over the course of the deal.

T-Mobile is pretty close though; for £30 a month and a free phone it costs £635, and you also get 100 extra minutes per month, which equates to an extra 108,000 seconds of chat for only £5.

Vodafone limps in third again, with 900 minutes and a free phone for £40 per month, but the same 300 extra minutes if you sign up online, for £720 over 18 months.

Best deal: Virgin Media – £630

1,200 mins

Virgin Media and T-Mobile tie this one: both deals will end up costing you £720 over the course of the contract.

Virgin Media only offers 1,000 minutes, whereas T-Mobile will offer you 1,200, but both cost £40 per month with a free phone.

Vodafone is proffering a huge 1,500 minute allowance if you sign up online, but costs £45 per month and will end up costing you £810 overall.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £720 (but with 200 more mins per month)

OK, you’ve read our HTC Desire review and decided that two years with this phone wouldn’t be so bad – we like the way you’re thinking.

But we wouldn’t want you to assume that’s the end of the decision making process – you’ve still got to choose a contract to go with that bad boy.

The Carphone Warehouse is only offering 24-month deals on Orange with unlimited internet – we expect that to change when we finally get the official tariffs through.

100-200 mins

Three networks in this one: T-Mobile, Virgin Media and Orange.

And it’s T-Mobile that takes the top slot, with a great £10 a month deal. The phone does cost £164 to buy first of all, and you only get 100 mins, but for £404 over two years you’re not going to get a lot better.

Virgin Media is offering the HTC Desire for £20 per month with 200 minutes, and an upfront cost of £149.99 – this equates to the much pricier £630.

And Orange comes in last, with 100 minutes on a £20 a month deal – and a whopping £240 for the phone as well.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £404

300 mins

Two options only here – T-Mobile and Orange.

The former is far and away the cheapest option again, with a cheap as chips £489 the cost over two years – at £15 per month and an early £129 upfront cost.

Orange is next up at £700 for the lifetime of the contract, at £25 per month and £100 for the phone – we can only hope that the official tariffs come in a little cheaper.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £489

500-600 mins

Now we’re getting somewhere – four networks duking it out, and it’s a lot closer this time between T-Mobile, Vodafone, Orange and Virgin Media.

Well, we say a lot closer, but T-Mobile is still ahead of the pack: for £20 per month and £129 at the start you get 600 mins for an overall cost of £609.

Virgin Media is up next, with 600 mins for £25 per month and £100 up front – that equates to a £700 lump sum.

Vodafone and Orange’s efforts will both set you back £720 over the two years (with a free phone) – with the latter you only get 500 mins, and with the former you can nab up to 300 bonus minutes (taking the total to 900) if you do it online.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £609

800-900 mins

All four in it to win it, with the price varying between £695 and £840 for the overall cost.

T-Mobile is (now predictably) the winner – it only costs £695 for a £25 per month deal, with the phone priced at £95.

If you only want 800 minutes but want to pay more cash, then check out Virgin Media’s offering – it’s £720 at £30 a month with a free phone.

And Vodafone and Orange tie again – both costing £840, but Vodafone offers 900 minutes (1,200 online) where Orange only offers 800.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £695

1,200 mins

We’re into seriously chatty territory here – so chatty that Orange hasn’t even got a tariff through The Carphone Warehouse.

£40 per month and a free phone (as well as 1,200 minutes, 1,500 online) will get you a Vodafone-branded HTC Desire for an overall cost of £960.

But the cheaper duo are the T-Mobile and Virgin Media offerings – the former giving 1,200 minutes, the latter 1,000 minutes for the same £840.

Best deal: T-Mobile – £840 (200 more minutes per month).

The findings paint an interesting early picture of the mobile phone landscape in the UK – it’s nothing like the Apple iPhone snooze-fest we’re used to when it comes to pricing.

T-Mobile is the winner of nearly every category when you average it out over the course of the deals – we certainly didn’t expect a near-whitewash from one network.

And, of course, it’s about more than this; many people get attracted by the prospect of a free phone at the start and are happy to pay a little bit more over the course of a contract. If that’s the case, Vodafone is a good bet, given that you can’t actually pay upfront for the HTC Desire on a contract with the network.

Don’t forget the smorgasbord of other independent sites out there undercutting the networks with different minute and handset contract combos – you can use a comparison site like Omio to see all those on offer.

Virgin Media has some comparably good deals in the mix as well, and we haven’t even taken into account the customer-centric offerings we’ve seen, with offers of either a £5 lower tariff for the same contract term or a shorter 18-month contract for the same monthly tariff.

If you’re an existing customer, this makes it far and away the cheapest in a number of categories – but we’re assuming many people won’t be.

So T-Mobile is so far the best way to get the HTC Desire on the cheapest deal when it’s all laid out. But it really depends how you like to buy your mobile really.

Resource:

http://www.techradar.com/news/phone-and-communications/mobile-phones/t-mobile-vodafone-orange-and-virgin-htc-desire-deals-compared-681187

App developers are gearing up for Apple’s iPad

Wednesday, March 24th, 2010

LOS ANGELES — For Scott Lahman, Apple’s soon-to-launch iPad tablet computer could be the next big thing. Really.

His company, Gogii, produces the TextPlus app for the iPhone, which lets folks send text messages free, bypassing the phone network. It has been downloaded more than 5 million times.

The iPad, a 9.7-inch touch-screen computer that Apple touts as a multimedia e-reader and mobile Web surfer, is set to launch April 3, starting at $499. It is an understatement to say that Lahman, and thousands of other developers who created programs for the iPhone, are excited about the possibilities. “If there ever was a space to do some land-grabbing in, this is it,” says Lahman, Gogii’s CEO.

Since Apple (AAPL) launched the iPhone in 2007, developers have created some 150,000 software applications, or apps, which have been downloaded 2 billion times. They range from free, ad-supported text-message workarounds like Gogii’s, to games, restaurant locators, music services and GPS location assistance. While most will work fine on the iPad, developers are racing to optimize existing apps to take advantage of the larger screen, or to dream up new ones.

The iPhone spawned a $1 billion-a-year industry for app developers, says analyst Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray. He predicts first-year sales of 2.7 million iPads, compared with 4 million iPhones in the first year. The iPhone has grown to become a third of Apple’s business, says Munster. The iPad has the potential to represent 10% to 15% of Apple’s annual revenue by 2012, he says.

“The iPad isn’t a phone,” says Munster. “It’s a different animal.”

But for developers, even if the iPad sells only 1 million units in the first year, it still represents a huge market that’s either an add-on to the existing iPhone market or an all-new one.

“I’d rather be in early than sit back and wait and let my competitors get early traction,” says Ken Willner, CEO of Zumobi, a Seattle-based developer of ad-supported apps for big media brands including MSNBC and Today. “It’s a larger device, so it’s better for advertising.”

Sure, the iPad will have a smaller audience initially, he says, but so-called early adopters are “much more engaged.” Zumobi will have a revamped app for Motor Trend magazine ready at launch.

Consumers who have bought apps for their iPhones, or the iPod Touch, will not pay extra to access them on an iPad. But an app will appear in the smaller, 3-inch mode with a big black border unless the developer optimizes it for the larger screen. This presents developers with new opportunities.

“This is the iPhone moving into the living room,” says Bart Decrem, CEO of Tapulous. Its Tap Tap Revenge is one of the iPhone’s most popular games, with 25 million downloads. “In the short term, it’s an extension of the iPhone. In the long term, it’s a brand-new platform that will move eyeballs off gaming consoles and laptops.”

A simulating experience
Before the iPhone, creating software for mobile devices meant dealing with the Big 4 U.S. wireless companies — AT&T, Verizon Wireless, Sprint and T-Mobile— and hoping to break in with an app that would give the wireless carrier 50% of the cut.

Apple made a more generous offer for the iPhone. Developers create the software and submit it to Apple for approval for sale in the iTunes Store. Apple keeps 30% and handles administration duties, while the developer gets 70%.

The challenge for developers for the iPad: creating something for a device they can’t yet hold in their hands.

Apple is notoriously secretive, and with a few exceptions, has not released advance copies of the iPad for developers. Instead, they have to download simulation software from Apple’s website.

Developer Ge Wang, whose start-up Smule has created two multimillion-selling hits for the iPhone, has pre-ordered seven iPads and hopes they’re delivered on April 3. But he’s going to stand in line at his local Apple Store as well, just to be sure.

“The emulator is pretty close, but there are some things we just can’t do with it,” he says. “Once we have the iPad in our hands, we can access the physical touch surface, and for us that will be huge.”

Alex Peters and her team at Melbourne, Australia-based Firemint are going to extreme lengths to get their hands on an iPad to try to adapt Flight Control for the iPad. The iPad won’t go on sale in Australia until May at the earliest. So Peters is working with a local Aussie who’s flying to New York to buy as many iPads as he can.

Gogii’s Lahman says he was watching online when Apple announced the iPad, after weeks of rumors, at an event in San Francisco on Jan. 27. His initial thought: “I just lost another 200 hours of sleep for the next two months.”

He and his team downloaded the emulation software and have spent the last two months writing software code to adapt TextPlus for the iPad, adding pictures and other graphics to take advantage of the bigger screen.

Still, he has several iPads on pre-order and, like Wang, will also brave the lines at the Apple Store on April 3, because “You just don’t know until you get your hands on it how it’s really going to work.”

Fuel for tablets?

Tablet computers, despite previous attempts by Apple and by Microsoft and its partners, including Hewlett-Packard and Toshiba, have never caught on. As independent analyst Rob Enderle says, a tablet’s “too big to carry around with you.”

Faster, cheaper processing power, better software and improved colorful touch-screens have convinced manufacturers that the tablet’s time may finally have come. Lenovo and HP both have new tablets in the works for later in the year, and start-up JooJoo has one, as well.

While Apple CEO Steve Jobs calls the iPad “magical” and “revolutionary,” it will lack some hardware and software features found on any Windows computer.

Like the iPhone, the iPad doesn’t support Adobe’s Flash software, which is used to watch most online video. That mean videos at popular sites such as Hulu and ComedyCentral.com can’t be viewed, and neither can videos at thousands of other websites that rely on Flash.

Additionally, the iPad doesn’t have slots for common computer add-ons, such as, say, a USB flash drive or external hard drive. If you want to import your own video clips, for instance, you’re out of luck, unless you first put them in Apple’s iTunes software and transfer them from the computer, or figure a way to move them via the Web.

No Flash, no available slots, too big to fit into a pocket: Those are huge drawbacks, Enderle says.

“Developers are spending a lot of time hoping the iPad is going to be huge,” he says. “If they’re wrong, and Apple has guessed wrong, then they’ve just wasted a ton of time and money on a platform that fell. I’d focus on the iPhone. It’s not going anywhere.”

Try telling that to Tim Westergren, chief strategy officer for online radio service Pandora.

The iPhone turned the struggling, unprofitable Pandora into a company with $50 million in revenue last year. The Pandora app has seen 15 million downloads, and 70% of Pandora’s off-PC listening now comes from the iPhone.

Westergren believes anyone who underestimates the iPad is betting wrong.

“My instinct says this is the kind of device you don’t understand until you’ve held it and used it,” he says. “I see it as way more than an e-reader that brings books to life. It’s a people’s computer.”

When Jobs unveiled the iPad in January, he showcased it by showing an optimized version of The New York Times, taking advantage of the big iPad screen. Columns could be merged and adjusted, and videos could come to life.

Magazine publisher Condé Nast recently introduced an iPhone app for its GQ magazine, offering monthly issues for $1.99 a pop, and is working on optimized iPad versions that take advantage of the larger screen for GQ, Wired, The New Yorker, Vanity Fair and Glamour.

Pending Apple’s approval, it hopes to have the April issue of GQ available for sale on the iPad, with pricing to be announced.

USA TODAY will have an iPad app available on April 3. It will be free for the first 90 days, sponsored by Courtyard by Marriott. After that, USA TODAY will announce subscription pricing.

National Public Radio, meanwhile, saw a “tenfold” increase in its mobile traffic with the iPhone, says Kinsey Wilson, senior vice president, so it’s a natural that it wants to be on board with a newly optimized app for the iPad. He sees the iPad as another opportunity “to extend the listening day.”

To make sure that listeners get to hear NPR on their iPads, NPR had to take extra steps. NPR uses Flash to stream audio on its website, and because Apple doesn’t work with Flash, NPR has optimized its website to recognize iPad users, switching to a different software platform to present audio.

“This is the biggest challenge we faced, but one worth undertaking,” says Wilson. “The experience Apple is creating with touch navigation is one we think is going to be important, and we want to be there at the opening bell.”

Wilson, and the thousands of other iPad developers, will find out in two weeks if it pays to be early.

Resource:

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2010-03-24-ipadapps24_CV_N.htm

Apple opens up iPad pre-orders

Tuesday, March 16th, 2010

Consumers begin online queue for tablet

Apple has officially opened up pre-ordering for its iPad tablet system.

Consumers can now place their pre-orders for the highly-anticipated device, which is scheduled for an official release on 3 April. Analyst estimates have placed early sales as high as 50,000 pre-orders.

The initial release would be limited to the US and only the Wi-Fi-enabled model. The company has said that 3G-equipped models and UK availability will be arriving later in the month.

First announced in January, the iPad has generated more buzz than any Apple product release since the iPhone. Like the handset, the iPad will operate almost exclusively on a touch screen interface, though a keyboard-equipped docking station will also be offered.

When it does arrive, the iPad could face stiff competition in the market from several competing tablets. Asus and HP have already unveiled prototype tablets, while Google and Dell are rumoured to be working on tablet models of their own.

Resource:

http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2259465/apple-opens-ipad-pre-orders