Archive for March, 2010

BBC puts iPhone plans on ice

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

The BBC has reportedly put on hold its plans to release free iPhone news applications because of market fairness worries.

According to a report by the network’s news branch, the BBC Trust has decided to halt the planned April release of news and sports applications for the Apple handsets after newspaper publishers claimed that the apps gave the BBC an unfair advantage in the marketplace.

The Trust will reportedly review the plan and decide whether the apps would violate its public service agreement.

The row over the BBC’s iPhone applications comes as newspaper publishers seek to capitalize on Apple’s iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad platforms amidst slowing sales of print editions.

Major papers such as the Wall Street Journal and New York Times have announced agreements with Apple to offer newspaper special subscription offers of their daily papers formatted for the iPad tablet.

The report also comes as the BBC is said to be cutting back on its own online operations. Media reports claimed that the company would be reducing its web operations by as much as one half.

Resource:

http://www.v3.co.uk/v3/news/2260500/bbc-puts-iphone-plans-ice

IPad Could Redefine Apple’s Stores

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

A store redesign is the least Apple can do for the iPad, a device whose ability to sell content might bring the company a fresh bonanza.

A few weeks ago, Apple (AAPL) decided to start taking preorders for its widely anticipated iPad. It’s one of those products that if successful, will redefine the computing landscape, much as its cousin the iPhone has done.

There’s also a chance that the world may not be impressed with the iPad’s brilliance. Given how excited I’ve been about the product, many of my friends and colleagues are wondering why I didn’t preorder one. The answer is simple: I want to write about the iPad launch from the point of view of a retail buyer. I plan to head over to the Apple store in San Francisco on Saturday, stand in line, and see if I can actually get my hands on one that way.

What I really want to see is how Apple reorganizes its retail experience to fit the iPad. Right now, when you walk into a typical Apple store in the U.S., you get a fairly binary experience: Macs on one side of the store, iPhones and iPods on the other. Apple has used this clear demarcation of its two major product lines—computers and entertainment devices—to create a brilliant retail experience.

A floating row of alternating iPads?

Soon the iPad will join the mix—not quite an iPhone and definitely not a traditional computer. On which side of the aisle will Apple put this device? I think the retail display will pretty much define the category in which the iPad falls. I’m hoping that Apple redesigns the stores, carving out a whole new space for the iPad.

If it were up to me, I’d line up a single row of iPads, with their front and backs alternating. They’d be mounted on a transparent stand, so that from a distance it would look as though they were floating in the air.

Analysts are expecting a hit. Morgan Stanley’s (MS) Katy Huberty expects Apple to ship more than 6 million iPads this year, far higher than the consensus expectation of 3 to 4 million units. Huberty expects 2.5 million iPads to ship between March and May and an additional 750,000 during the June quarter. She points out that iPad suppliers are estimating that Apple will make between 8 and 10 million of these devices. For each million iPads sold, she estimates that Apple will earn an additional 25¢ a share.

I think Huberty might herself be underestimating the iPad’s money-making potential. Having played around with one for 20 minutes, I can tell you that this device will make users spend far more money on apps, books, music, and other content than they do via the iPhone. Given that Apple takes roughly 30% of sales, the iPad could be another bonanza in the making.

Now, back to waiting for the weekend.

Resource:

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2010/tc20100330_376043.htm

IPad could be Kindle’s first big threat in e-books

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO – Amazon.com, which has dominated the young but fast-growing electronic book market for the past few years with the Kindle, could get its biggest threat Saturday, when Apple releases its iPad multimedia tablet.

The Kindle starts at $259 and is designed mainly for reading text on a gray-and-black screen. The iPad starts at $499, but with the higher price comes more functions: a color touch screen for downloading books from Apple’s new iBookstore, surfing the Web, playing videos and games and more.

It will take time to determine whether the iPad causes a tremor in the e-reader market, a high-magnitude quake or something in between. But in the meantime people who read electronic books or are considering buying a reading device will find their choices getting more complicated.

If the Kindle e-reader falls out of favor with people drawn to Apple’s offering, there could be a very thick silver lining for Amazon: It sells e-books that can be read on many kinds of devices, including the iPad and other Apple gadgets. That means the Kindle could fade and Amazon could still occupy a profitable perch in e-books.

However, Apple could find ways to tilt the field in its favor. At least for now, both the Apple iBookstore and the Kindle service will be accessible in much the same way on the iPad — as “application” icons that users can click. Eventually Apple could give its own bookstore and reading program more attention on the iPad.

Apple also could try to curry favor with publishers in a way that matters to consumers, perhaps by securing exclusive titles.

Publishers’ relationships with Amazon have been strained by Amazon’s insistence on charging $9.99 for some popular e-books. Publishers have complained that it is an attempt to get consumers used to unsustainably low prices. Amazon takes a loss on some books at that price, and the publishers fear that if the $9.99 tag sticks, Amazon will force publishers to lower their wholesale prices, cutting into their profits.

The iPad gives publishers an opportunity for a new pricing model. Some e-books will cost up to $14.99 initially, and Apple is insisting that publishers can’t sell books at a lower price through a competitor. The iBookstore is launching with titles from major publishers such as Penguin, Simon & Schuster, HarperCollins, Hachette Book Group and Macmillan. One big publisher, Random House, has not yet struck a deal with Apple.

Amazon declined to comment on the iPad’s release.

Although Amazon has tried to snag as much of the e-book market as possible since launching the Kindle in 2007, the company has never revealed how many Kindles it has sold. Analysts estimate it has sold 3 million. (Analysts believe Apple could sell that many iPads in the product’s first year). Amazon has offered only sketches of the Kindle’s effect on its business, such as by saying that when books are sold in both hard copy and the Kindle format, it sells 48 Kindle books for every 100 hard copies.

Compared to the Kindle, the iPad would seem to have some disadvantages. The entry-level model is nearly twice the price of the Kindle, yet it can’t download books everywhere. It can do that only where it is connected to the Internet over Wi-Fi. At 1 1/2 pounds, it is more than twice as heavy as a Kindle. And its battery lasts for just 10 hours, compared with up to a week on a Kindle when it has its wireless access on.

However, among the elements in the iPad’s favor is a touch screen that is 9.7 inches diagonally, compared with 6 inches on the Kindle. Ron Skinner, 70, who lives in Las Vegas and bought a Kindle last February, says he has ordered Apple’s product because he thinks it will offer a better reading experience.

Skinner, an Apple investor who reads about three books a week, says the contrast between the text and the background is too low on the Kindle’s “e-ink” screen, and reading on it bothers his eyes. The difference between the Kindle screen and the iPad screen “is like daylight and dark,” Skinner says.

Tim Bajarin, an analyst with Creative Strategies Inc., says the iPad signals the start of a larger shift away from static digital versions of books and magazines. Eventually e-books will be expected to have multimedia dimensions, with video and interactive elements, he says, which calls for something more like Apple’s tablet device than something that is largely dedicated to reading.

The main question then would be whether Amazon wants to try to soup up the Kindle to be more like a tablet, or whether it will remain content to offer something more specialized. Consider that the Kindle also can surf the Web, but it’s not a feature that’s highlighted or encouraged much.

Amazon stock has risen about 11 percent since Apple unveiled the iPad in January, while Apple shares have climbed 13 percent. But it’s possible that investors haven’t seen many risks yet for Amazon because it’s not yet clear how people will see the iPad.

People might not want it as an alternative to the Kindle and a laptop, says James McQuivey, a Forrester analyst. Instead, he says, they might see the iPad mainly as a big iPod, leaving room for other kinds of devices. And the hype surrounding the iPad may help Kindle sales with consumers who want a less expensive digital reading experience.

“The iPad will bring all kinds of consumer benefits that the Kindle can’t even pretend to attempt,” McQuivey says, “but at the same time the Kindle solves a very focused consumer need in a way the iPad can’t do well.”

Resource:
Yahoo News

Father of iPod, iPhone leaves Apple

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

After nine years with Apple, Tony Fadell, who helped envision and create the iPod and iPhone, has formally left the company. He will now be an all-around adviser to tech companies around the world.

Fadell was the first man to sign on to iPod’s engineering team in 2001. 5 years later, he became the head of the iPod division and was a key figure in developing the iPhone.

Fadell decided to step down from his executive position at Apple in 2008. At the time, he said he wanted to remain as an adviser to Steve Jobs and provide work in a freelance capacity exclusively to Apple.

However, today’s move, which was first reported by the New York Times, severs all ties to the company he helped bloom into what it is today.

Apparently Fadell is big into green technology now and wants to focus his career at this point to that focus.

“My primary focus will be helping the environment by working with consumer green-tech companies,” he said to the New York Times. “I’m determined to tell my kids and grandkids amazing stories beyond my iPod and iPhone ones.”

Resource:

http://www.tgdaily.com/the-majors-apple/49174-father-of-ipod-iphone-leaves-apple